Imbibing Madness

Andrew Guffey • April 17, 2026

The problem of bloodthirsty delight

In Romeo and Juliet Fr. Laurence remarks, in stunning Shakespearean clarity: "These violent delights have violent ends." Fr. Laurence was cautioning Romeo against letting runaway passion direct his actions. "Therefore," he says, "love moderately: long love doth so." Love patiently, love well. That's Fr. Laurence's advice, because the bit and bridle of untamed passion often leads to disaster. Or, as the foreboding line in Shakespeare's fine phrasing has it: "these violent delights have violent ends." In the HBO series Westworld this line becomes emblematic of the central conflict: Westworld is a technologically advanced amusement park, where the hosts (the Western themed characters) are all extraordinarily life-like androids. The patrons interact with these hosts in a variety of ways, but among them are violent and brutal acts. The patrons are free to unleash, as it were, all of their violent and basest desires on these humanoids. But, as the androids become more self-aware and begin to remember what they have been subjected to, as one might expect, "these violent delights have violent ends." Romantic fever is not the only dangerous desire the human heart holds.

In his magisterial work, The Confessions, St. Augustine explores the structure and scaffolding of desire as he tells the story of his life and his awakening to God. If for many Christians, the heart of the faith has been about belief, arguably for Augustine, the heart of the faith is about desire. The whole work is framed as an outpouring of praise, prayer, and confession to God. The famous line from the first paragraph: "You have made us for yourself, and our heart is restless until it rests in you." Or, from book ten: "Late have I loved you, beauty so old and so new: late have I loved you. And see you were within and I was in the external world and sought you there, and in my unlovely state I plunged into those lovely created things which you made." Augustine is constantly examining his desires, how he desired fame and wealth, and famously women. But none of these delights satisfied, none brought him purpose or meaning. These violent delights, Augustine would eventually conclude, have violent ends.


As he tells his story, Augustine highlights a few other key characters . Monica, his mother, looms throughout, but around the edges are also his son, Adeodatus, and Adeodatus's unnamed mother, and a small selection of Augustine's friends. In fact, when Augustine is finally baptized at the age of 33, he is baptized alongside his teenage son and his erstwhile student and friend, Alypius. Eventually Alypius would go on to become the bishop of their hometown, Thagaste, while Augstine would become the bishop of Hippo Regius. But on their way to the episcopacy and sainthood, both found themselves caught up in violent delights. For Alypius, the delights were literally violent. In book six, while they are in Rome, Alypius is dragged to the gladiatorial games by a group of friends. Alypius is determined not to watch; he thinks these games are barbarous. Even so, once the crowd begins to cheer, Alypius dares to peek and see what is happening. "As soon as he saw the blood," Augustine says, "he at once drank in savagery and did not turn away. His eyes were riveted. He imbibed madness." Augustine continues: "Without any awareness of what was happening to him, he found delight in the murderous contest and was inebriated by bloodthirsty pleasure" (6.8.13). Of course, Augustine assures his readers, God would deliver Alypius from those delights, though much later.


Augustine was well aware that the human heart can harbor fascination with violence, bloodthirstiness, attraction to cruelty and inflicting pain. We see this in the popularity of violent films and television shows. Sometimes the violence is simply a mirror reflecting reality, and sometimes it is there to stoke our love of violence. Quentin Tarantino's films are stuffed full of violence, even absurdly so. Whatever we make of that absurdity, the violence is palpable, deliberate, and if we're honest, scratches an itch for some. One reviewer, writing for the Guardian last month penned a striking retrospective: "It may not be your classic cosy watch, but Kill Bill provides me with that warm, fuzzy feeling only cathartic violence can bring." Some psychologists do indeed affirm that certain forms of controlled violence (film, video games, etc.) can be cathartic--it can allow us to purge our pent up feelings of violence and aggression. But, as with Augustine's friend Alypius, it can also feed our violent delights.


Pulp Fiction might be Tarantino's most famous film. As a black comedy, it also contains a fair amount of violence. In that malaise of violent delights, one scene stands out, and it has also made the news this week. One of the plot lines of the film follows Vincent and Jules, two hitmen, who track down an unsavory business associate, Brett, and kill him. In the death scene, Jules (played by Samuel L. Jackson) recites "Ezekiel 25:17": "The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you." Then Jules and Vincent unload their guns on Brett.


If you've seen the news this week, you know that the Secretary of Defense, who styles himself the Secretary of War, quoted this passage as a prayer in a speech he gave regarding the downed airman in Iran earlier this month: “They call it CSAR 25:17, which I think is meant to reflect Ezekiel 25:17, so the prayer is CSAR 25:17, and it reads, and pray with me, please, ‘The path of the downed aviator is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of camaraderie and duty, shepherd the lost through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother’s keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to capture and destroy my brother. And you will know My call sign is Sandy 1 when I lay my vengeance upon thee. Amen.”


The Secretary of Defense asked the room to pray this prayer with him, lifted from a violent film, where the violence really serves no purpose beyond itself. Moreover, as many have now noted, that's not even what Ezekiel 25:17 says. The Pentagon apparently defended the Secretary by saying he was reciting a customary prayer among the search and rescue team, and was not misquoting Ezekiel. But it does follow a pattern with the Secretary and the Department of Defense under his "leadership"--a pattern of bloodthirstiness and violence-mongering in the name of God. If you've ever wondered what taking the name of the Lord in vain is--it's that. This pattern reflects violent delights, or rather delight in violence, bathed in veneer of holiness. Unchecked this rhetoric stirs up delight not in justice, not in just war, but in "holy war," violence for the sake of violence. It's drinking in savagery; it's imbibing madness.


There is a dangerous adolescence (in the worst possible sense) at work in this sort of prayer. It could just be laughed off as an innocent blunder, but the prayer resonates with a violent culture that wants violence to be righteous. I remember when Pulp Fiction came out. Not because I saw it, but because I had (male) friends who had and were enticed by just that scene. I have a playwright friend who used to audition students for plays at the university he was studying at. A large proportion of the male students chose that scene as their monologue. There is a delight in this violence. Perhaps with teenage boys we don't worry (though we should): they'll grow out of it (will they?). But when the adolescent who takes delight in spouting such a prayer commands the U.S. military, that's dangerous in the extreme. Because we see where it leads--to impetuous acts of aggression, to cavalier taking of human life, to violence without end, to conflict forever: these violent delights have violent ends.


Pope Leo has condemned the bellicose posture and actions that have issued from our Department of Defense. The President of the United States can't seem to stand an American Pope who doesn't abide fools. The Vice President (a Roman Catholic convert, no less) had the audacity to suggest the Pope doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to theology. I think the Pope knows his theology quite a bit better than the Vice President. I suspect the Pope has actually read Augustine's thought on just war, and he knows, for instance, that St. Augustine never thought a just war was a good war. Augustine himself wrote: "What is the evil in war? ...The real evils in war are love of violence, revengeful cruelty, fierce and implacable enmity, wild resistance, and the lust of power, and such like" (c. Faust. 22.74). Had the Secretary of Defense actually read Ezekiel 25:17 he might have noticed the warning latent in the passage: "Thus says the Lord GOD: Because with unending hostilities the Philistines acted in vengeance and with malice of heart too revenge in destruction, therefore thus says the Lord GOD: I will stretch out my hand against the Philistines, cut off the Cherethites, and destroy the rest of the coast. I will execute great vengeance on them with wrathful punishments. Then they shall know that I am the LORD, when I lay my vengeance on them" (Ezekiel 25:15-17). Or, as Augustine would put it, having spoken of love of violence, revengeful cruelty, etc., he says, "and it is generally to punish these things, when force is required to inflict the punishment, that, in obedience to God or some lawful authority, good men undertake wars, when they find themselves in such a position as regards the conduct of human affairs, that right conduct requires them to act, or to make others act in this way." Augustine made room for war, but only to check such blind and naked aggression.


When we delight in violence, we stand in for these Philistines. God does not love violence. God does not love war. Neither should we. We should take no pride in our power to dominate, but in our power to heal. We should take no delight in destruction, but in our capacity to create. We should delight not in the taking of life, but in love, compassion, mercy. For these resemble most the heart of God. God is love, and love is of God (1 John 4:7-8). We should set all our affection on God, and beg to be healed of our violent delights. Maybe we will learn to pray, not in the words of Quentin Tarantino, but in the words of Harry Emerson Fosdick's hymn, "God of grace and God of glory" (Hymnal #594): "Cure thy children's warring madness, bend our pride to thy control; shame our wanton, selfish gladness, rich in things and poor in soul. Grant us wisdom, grant us courage, lest we miss thy kingdom's goal, lest we miss thy kingdom's goal."

By Andrew Guffey June 7, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey June 5, 2026
Christians and (Gay) Pride
By Andrew Guffey May 30, 2026
Pope Leo on the challenges of our times
By Peter Trumbore May 26, 2026
Some years ago I was having a conversation with a student when she noticed the Jesus action figure on the bookshelf behind my desk. What, doesn't everyone have a Jesus action figure in their office? Anyway, this led to a conversation about churches and church traditions. She had grown up in the Pentecostal church and asked me what I thought of the practice of speaking in tongues. I told her it wasn't part of my church tradition, but that I understood it as one of the gifts of the spirit that Paul identifies in 1 Corinthians 12:8-10, though I admitted my own skepticism that the way speaking in tongues is typically practiced was actually divinely inspired. And I followed up with a question of my own. I asked whether in her church she had ever encountered someone with the gift of the interpretation of tongues, another on Paul's list. She said she hadn't, though she didn't attach any real significance to that. I was reminded of this conversation in church on Sunday when one of our readings was that very section of Paul's letter. In it he identifies the variety of gifts that the spirit may impart, emphasizing that for all of the differences in gifts, they all come from or flow through the same spirit. Here's Paul's list: utterance of wisdom through the spirit; utterance of knowledge according to the spirit; faith; gifts of healing; the working of powerful deeds; prophecy; discernment of spirits; various kinds of tongues; and the interpretation of tongues. I reading up for this topic, I came across a piece written by a Pentecostal writer who says that when he finds himself in periods of spiritual crisis he prays in tongues for wisdom from God. I honestly have no idea what that means in practice. Perhaps I've not sufficiently opened myself up to receive the Holy Spirit. Or maybe I just don't get it. I suspect I'm not the only one baffled here. So let's talk about it in our conversation this evening. What do you make of Paul's list of the gifts of the spirit? Do you take their meaning literally, or is this more metaphorical and rhetorical? Have you ever experienced any of these gifts firsthand, either in yourself or witnessed in others? If you were coming up with such a list today, what would be on it? Join us for the discussion this evening starting at 7pm at Irish Tavern in downtown Lake Orion. The weather is beautiful, so we may be out on the patio. Look for us there. And a reminder, this is our last meeting before we take our break for the summer. We'll swing back into action in September.
By Andrew Guffey May 26, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey May 23, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey May 23, 2026
Over the bent world broods
By Peter Trumbore May 18, 2026
With mid-May upon us, and summer on the doorstep, we are well and truly into spring, typically seen as a season of renewal. A couple of things have brought this to my mind this week. And not just the flowers growing up and around and through the old animal skulls that we artistically left in the chaos garden behind the house when we moved in two springs ago. For context, these used to hang on the wall in the garage at our old house. First, in typical New York Times fashion, their podcast The Daily last week ran a piece on what was claimed to be Americans' "revisiting of religion," and "putting secularism on hold." I listened to the thing, and what it seems to be based on is anecdotal evidence drawn from conversations that the writer of their Belongings newsletter has had with friends, acquaintances, and her family members over the last year or two of her writing the newsletter. Classic New York Times! But still something to contemplate, especially her argument that this turn back to religion is being driven by people's desire for community, connection, and meaning in their lives. Second, and in an echo of our topic of discussion last week, The Washington Post last week ran a piece by a religion professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington proposing that the government's release of new previously classified material on UFOs was offering support and recognition of a new religion, belief in UFOs. The author writes: "UFO belief is not a religion in the traditional sense. There are no centralized leaders: no popes, no universally recognized doctrines, no sacred text and no institution capable of enforcing orthodoxy. Yet it increasingly performs many of the functions historically attributed to religion. It organizes communities of belief, creates narratives of revelation, offers cosmological meaning and establishes interpretive frameworks through which people understand mysterious experiences and humanity’s place in the universe." A key idea here is that UFO religion is profoundly anti-institutional, built on a foundation of distrust of government, mainstream media, academia, and organized religion. But again, driven by people seeking community, connection, and meaning. Finally, over the weekend there was a White House-sponsored all-day prayer event on the National Mall in Washington D.C. aimed at "rededicating" America as "One Nation under God." Of course it was a decidedly Christian and evangelical version of God that was the focus. Still, thousands showed up and participated. More people looking for and apparently finding some kind of connection, community, and meaning. And a form of renewal at least in the eyes of the organizers and participants in the event. We're going to talk about the idea of renewal in our conversation this week. Are we in a time of spiritual or religious renewal in this country, as the above examples suggest? What would such a thing look like? Would we know it if we saw it? And is it renewal at all, or something different? Join us for the discussion starting at 7pm Tuesday, May 19 at Irish Tavern in downtown Lake Orion.
By Andrew Guffey May 17, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey May 15, 2026
The Feast of the Ascension