Common Prayer

Andrew Guffey • May 9, 2026

A Primer on the Book of Common Prayer

I have a confession: sometimes I feel like I’m not encouraging the people of St. Mary’s to be very good Episcopalians. Not that I’m discouraging being good Episcopalians, but there is an aspect of our tradition as Episcopalians that is harder to maintain and promote in our historical moment. I’m referring to the practice of common prayer, and more specifically, the use of the Book of Common Prayer.

 

On Saturday, May 9, five of our youth will be confirmed in the Episcopal Church. To mark the occasion we presented each of them with a Book of Common Prayer (BCP). That’s because the BCP is one of the most distinctive marks of the Episcopal Church and the global Anglican Communion. Most churches have hymnals and Bibles in their pews. In any given Episcopal Church, like ours, one is more likely to find hymnals and BCPs.

 

So, what is the BCP? Where did it come from? Why has it been so important? And what should we do with it today? I thought maybe I should offer some initial thoughts on all of this. So, here’s a brief primer on the BCP.

 


The first BCP was born during the English Reformation. As you may recall, during the sixteenth century, Christianity in the West (meaning, mainly Western Europe), went through a variety of transformations, or, as the leading proponents often called them, reformations. They did not set out to found new churches, but rather to reform the Church, to renew what had been forgotten, restore what had been lost, and to excise excesses.

 

Henry VIII, originally not a fan of Martin Luther, one of the principal reformers, eventually came to the conclusion that the Church of his realm needed some reform also, and with the help of select political actors and Cardinals established the Church of England as both continuous with and autonomous of the Roman Catholic Church.

 

The Archbishop of Canterbury had been, for many centuries, the most venerable ecclesiastical leader in England. Henry appointed Thomas Cranmer, who was sympathetic to the burgeoning reforms, as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1532. One of the hallmarks of the reformation was to put more of the faith in the hands of the people. Instead of using Latin for liturgies (which most common folk did not know), the reformers preferred liturgical and biblical texts to be presented in the vernacular language of a people. A convenient instrument for making that possible was the relatively new technology of the printed book. There had be handwritten books, of course, and devotional books of daily prayers. But Thomas worked on putting together a book that would eventually become the first Book of Common Prayer in 1549.

 

The name announces its purpose—this was to be the book that guided the common prayer of the people of England. The liturgies of the churches, rather than following their own customs and relying on Latin, would be in English and standardized throughout the realm. Cranmer’s idea was that all the English people would share a common language of prayer. Cranmer himself drew prayers from a variety of sources, but also composed many of his own. Indeed, many of the Collects in our modern BCP are reproductions or adaptations of Cranmer’s BCP.

 

The settled BCP (still the official Prayer Book of the Church of England) was published in 1662. It was the capstone of a process of forming the identity of the Church of England in the seventeenth century. It contained rites for the Daily Office, modeled on monastic offices, but condensed into Morning and Evening Prayer. It also contained the rite of the Eucharist (in one authorized form), Baptism, and other important occasions. And since the Psalms are integral especially to the Daily Office, the whole of the Psalter was included.

 

Ok, that’s a fair bit of history. What’s the point of all of that? The point is that the Book of Common Prayer has been the instrument that shaped the prayers of the people of the Church of England and its progeny for centuries. And it was always meant to be a book that put the prayers of the church in the hands of ordinary, faithful Christians, not as a means of replacing their heartfelt, personal prayer life, but as a way to bind a people together in prayer. That, I think, is the beauty of the BCP: it is the language and forms of prayer that we hold in common.

 

Of course, our BCP looks and sounds somewhat different than the 1662 Prayer Book. The first American BCP was promulgated in 1789 (ring any bells?), and was a deliberate revision of the English BCP, along the lines of the Scottish BCP. There’s a lot of jolly interesting history I’m skipping over here, but suffice it to say that as the realm grew into a colonizing Empire, the colonies developed their own language of common prayer, continuous with but also distinct from the English BCP. And the Episcopal Church in the new United States of America is one of the prime examples.

 

The American BCP has undergone its own transformations, with major revisions appearing in 1892 and 1928, and our current Prayer Book in 1979. The 1979 BCP departed from previous editions by including both Rite I (traditional language) and Rite II (contemporary language) forms for the Daily Office and the Eucharist. Moreover, there are at least six distinct Eucharistic Prayers in the current BCP. (Well, in 2024 General Convention changed the definition of what counts as the “Book of Common Prayer” to include “Those liturgical forms and other texts authorized by the General Convention in accordance with this article and the Canons of this Church,” but that’s a story for another day.) Just as the common language of prayer expanded during the colonial expansion of the realm to the empire, so too, the 1979 BCP expanded the forms of prayer, especially of the Eucharist. Some of those who grew up with the 1928 BCP find the expansion unsettling, because a) it makes for a more difficult book to navigate, and b) the expansion might threaten the sense that we share a single language of prayer.

 

And yet, the 1979 BCP has help up pretty well. Sure, there are small tweaks here and there I would prefer, but on the whole, once one gets used to it, it is still able to bind us together in a common language of prayer. And. It’s always there for you when you need it.

When I handed our confirmands their BCPs I told them this story: When I was in college I was part of an evangelical campus ministry. We prayed extemporaneously (not with “wrote down” prayers), as the Spirit led us. And I was pretty good at it. Until I wasn’t. Toward the end of my senior year I struggled in my language of prayer. I didn’t feel like I had the words to pray what I wanted to pray. But when I made a quick visit home, I picked up my great aunt’s BCP. I brought it back with me to college. And I found words that said what I wanted to say, and words that I needed to hear. It opened up a new language of prayer for me. Or rather, it introduced me to a time-tested and venerable language that I knew little about. It gave me a language of prayer that I didn’t have to make up, but that was already a tradition of common prayer. It contained a set of forms of prayer and a language of prayer that bound me to living and historic community, that bound me to the greater church.

 

Now, I’ll admit, the BCPs in our pews are a little difficult to navigate, but the next time you’re in church, let me encourage you to crack it open, flip through its pages, and scan the lines. It's a book that has guided and shaped the prayers of Anglicans and Episcopalians for centuries. You might just find a language of prayer that is ours, a way of common prayer that you didn’t know could be yours.


By Peter Trumbore May 26, 2026
Some years ago I was having a conversation with a student when she noticed the Jesus action figure on the bookshelf behind my desk. What, doesn't everyone have a Jesus action figure in their office? Anyway, this led to a conversation about churches and church traditions. She had grown up in the Pentecostal church and asked me what I thought of the practice of speaking in tongues. I told her it wasn't part of my church tradition, but that I understood it as one of the gifts of the spirit that Paul identifies in 1 Corinthians 12:8-10, though I admitted my own skepticism that the way speaking in tongues is typically practiced was actually divinely inspired. And I followed up with a question of my own. I asked whether in her church she had ever encountered someone with the gift of the interpretation of tongues, another on Paul's list. She said she hadn't, though she didn't attach any real significance to that. I was reminded of this conversation in church on Sunday when one of our readings was that very section of Paul's letter. In it he identifies the variety of gifts that the spirit may impart, emphasizing that for all of the differences in gifts, they all come from or flow through the same spirit. Here's Paul's list: utterance of wisdom through the spirit; utterance of knowledge according to the spirit; faith; gifts of healing; the working of powerful deeds; prophecy; discernment of spirits; various kinds of tongues; and the interpretation of tongues. I reading up for this topic, I came across a piece written by a Pentecostal writer who says that when he finds himself in periods of spiritual crisis he prays in tongues for wisdom from God. I honestly have no idea what that means in practice. Perhaps I've not sufficiently opened myself up to receive the Holy Spirit. Or maybe I just don't get it. I suspect I'm not the only one baffled here. So let's talk about it in our conversation this evening. What do you make of Paul's list of the gifts of the spirit? Do you take their meaning literally, or is this more metaphorical and rhetorical? Have you ever experienced any of these gifts firsthand, either in yourself or witnessed in others? If you were coming up with such a list today, what would be on it? Join us for the discussion this evening starting at 7pm at Irish Tavern in downtown Lake Orion. The weather is beautiful, so we may be out on the patio. Look for us there. And a reminder, this is our last meeting before we take our break for the summer. We'll swing back into action in September.
By Andrew Guffey May 26, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey May 23, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey May 23, 2026
Over the bent world broods
By Peter Trumbore May 18, 2026
With mid-May upon us, and summer on the doorstep, we are well and truly into spring, typically seen as a season of renewal. A couple of things have brought this to my mind this week. And not just the flowers growing up and around and through the old animal skulls that we artistically left in the chaos garden behind the house when we moved in two springs ago. For context, these used to hang on the wall in the garage at our old house. First, in typical New York Times fashion, their podcast The Daily last week ran a piece on what was claimed to be Americans' "revisiting of religion," and "putting secularism on hold." I listened to the thing, and what it seems to be based on is anecdotal evidence drawn from conversations that the writer of their Belongings newsletter has had with friends, acquaintances, and her family members over the last year or two of her writing the newsletter. Classic New York Times! But still something to contemplate, especially her argument that this turn back to religion is being driven by people's desire for community, connection, and meaning in their lives. Second, and in an echo of our topic of discussion last week, The Washington Post last week ran a piece by a religion professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington proposing that the government's release of new previously classified material on UFOs was offering support and recognition of a new religion, belief in UFOs. The author writes: "UFO belief is not a religion in the traditional sense. There are no centralized leaders: no popes, no universally recognized doctrines, no sacred text and no institution capable of enforcing orthodoxy. Yet it increasingly performs many of the functions historically attributed to religion. It organizes communities of belief, creates narratives of revelation, offers cosmological meaning and establishes interpretive frameworks through which people understand mysterious experiences and humanity’s place in the universe." A key idea here is that UFO religion is profoundly anti-institutional, built on a foundation of distrust of government, mainstream media, academia, and organized religion. But again, driven by people seeking community, connection, and meaning. Finally, over the weekend there was a White House-sponsored all-day prayer event on the National Mall in Washington D.C. aimed at "rededicating" America as "One Nation under God." Of course it was a decidedly Christian and evangelical version of God that was the focus. Still, thousands showed up and participated. More people looking for and apparently finding some kind of connection, community, and meaning. And a form of renewal at least in the eyes of the organizers and participants in the event. We're going to talk about the idea of renewal in our conversation this week. Are we in a time of spiritual or religious renewal in this country, as the above examples suggest? What would such a thing look like? Would we know it if we saw it? And is it renewal at all, or something different? Join us for the discussion starting at 7pm Tuesday, May 19 at Irish Tavern in downtown Lake Orion.
By Andrew Guffey May 17, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey May 15, 2026
The Feast of the Ascension 
By Peter Trumbore May 11, 2026
Just last week, the federal government released their latest set of "disclosures" concerning UFOs, or, as the government now calls them, "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena," (UAPs). Or what we used to call flying saucers and little green men, The collection of photos and reports was met with what could best be described as an underwhelming response. Writing in The Atlantic, astrophysicist Adam Frank put it this way: "Spaceships. That’s all I’m asking for. Just one actual stinking spaceship. I’d also take an actual alien body—I’ve been told that the government has some of them as well. Instead, the first “alien files,” released yesterday, appear to be the same old, same old: stories, but no hard evidence—certainly not of the kind I’d want to see as a scientist, or that could truly advance the debate about UFOs and their alien connection. ... I am disappointed." If you read that like I did, then I suspect you too have echoes of the story of Doubting Thomas ringing in your ears. We hear the story of Thomas right after Easter. It recounts the disciple's unwillingness to accept the fact of the resurrection unless he can see and touch the evidence for himself. Thomas needed to see the marks and put his fingers in the wounds before he'd believe that Christ had risen from the dead. This raises the obvious question of what counts as evidence, whether we're talking about the truth of the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence, or any other phenomenon we accept as true without ever having seen or experienced for ourselves. Take earthquakes, for example. I know they exist but I've never seen or felt one in real life. Or Bigfoot. I know Bigfoot is real even though I've never laid eyes on the critter. OK, maybe not Bigfoot. And maybe not the supposed "mummified aliens" that were displayed several years ago on the floor of the Mexican congress. One of them is shown in the photo above. Let's just say that in this case seeing was not necessarily believing, as this report from Reuters attests. The latest set of disclosures on UFOs has also been met with more than a healthy dose of skepticism. The Associated Press reports that the latest releases leave the task of interpreting the meaning of the photos and the reports to the public themselves. For the astrophysicist Frank, that's not good enough: "A real disclosure would look very different, because only one thing matters: hard evidence." So let's talk about this question of evidence in our conversation this week. What would it take for you to believe in the reality of UFOs, or, for that matter, anything else that lives outside the realm of your own personal experience? What counts as evidence for you, whether the question is about UFOs, or Bigfoot, or the resurrection for that matter? Join us for the discussion starting at 7pm. Due to the water main failure's impact on Lake Orion, we will meet this week at Sullivan's Public House in downtown Oxford. Parking is easiest behind the restaurant. We will probably be seated upstairs, so if you don't see us when you arrive, look for us there.
By Andrew Guffey May 9, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey May 3, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.