Common Prayer

Andrew Guffey • May 9, 2026

A Primer on the Book of Common Prayer

I have a confession: sometimes I feel like I’m not encouraging the people of St. Mary’s to be very good Episcopalians. Not that I’m discouraging being good Episcopalians, but there is an aspect of our tradition as Episcopalians that is harder to maintain and promote in our historical moment. I’m referring to the practice of common prayer, and more specifically, the use of the Book of Common Prayer.

 

On Saturday, May 9, five of our youth will be confirmed in the Episcopal Church. To mark the occasion we presented each of them with a Book of Common Prayer (BCP). That’s because the BCP is one of the most distinctive marks of the Episcopal Church and the global Anglican Communion. Most churches have hymnals and Bibles in their pews. In any given Episcopal Church, like ours, one is more likely to find hymnals and BCPs.

 

So, what is the BCP? Where did it come from? Why has it been so important? And what should we do with it today? I thought maybe I should offer some initial thoughts on all of this. So, here’s a brief primer on the BCP.

 


The first BCP was born during the English Reformation. As you may recall, during the sixteenth century, Christianity in the West (meaning, mainly Western Europe), went through a variety of transformations, or, as the leading proponents often called them, reformations. They did not set out to found new churches, but rather to reform the Church, to renew what had been forgotten, restore what had been lost, and to excise excesses.

 

Henry VIII, originally not a fan of Martin Luther, one of the principal reformers, eventually came to the conclusion that the Church of his realm needed some reform also, and with the help of select political actors and Cardinals established the Church of England as both continuous with and autonomous of the Roman Catholic Church.

 

The Archbishop of Canterbury had been, for many centuries, the most venerable ecclesiastical leader in England. Henry appointed Thomas Cranmer, who was sympathetic to the burgeoning reforms, as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1532. One of the hallmarks of the reformation was to put more of the faith in the hands of the people. Instead of using Latin for liturgies (which most common folk did not know), the reformers preferred liturgical and biblical texts to be presented in the vernacular language of a people. A convenient instrument for making that possible was the relatively new technology of the printed book. There had be handwritten books, of course, and devotional books of daily prayers. But Thomas worked on putting together a book that would eventually become the first Book of Common Prayer in 1549.

 

The name announces its purpose—this was to be the book that guided the common prayer of the people of England. The liturgies of the churches, rather than following their own customs and relying on Latin, would be in English and standardized throughout the realm. Cranmer’s idea was that all the English people would share a common language of prayer. Cranmer himself drew prayers from a variety of sources, but also composed many of his own. Indeed, many of the Collects in our modern BCP are reproductions or adaptations of Cranmer’s BCP.

 

The settled BCP (still the official Prayer Book of the Church of England) was published in 1662. It was the capstone of a process of forming the identity of the Church of England in the seventeenth century. It contained rites for the Daily Office, modeled on monastic offices, but condensed into Morning and Evening Prayer. It also contained the rite of the Eucharist (in one authorized form), Baptism, and other important occasions. And since the Psalms are integral especially to the Daily Office, the whole of the Psalter was included.

 

Ok, that’s a fair bit of history. What’s the point of all of that? The point is that the Book of Common Prayer has been the instrument that shaped the prayers of the people of the Church of England and its progeny for centuries. And it was always meant to be a book that put the prayers of the church in the hands of ordinary, faithful Christians, not as a means of replacing their heartfelt, personal prayer life, but as a way to bind a people together in prayer. That, I think, is the beauty of the BCP: it is the language and forms of prayer that we hold in common.

 

Of course, our BCP looks and sounds somewhat different than the 1662 Prayer Book. The first American BCP was promulgated in 1789 (ring any bells?), and was a deliberate revision of the English BCP, along the lines of the Scottish BCP. There’s a lot of jolly interesting history I’m skipping over here, but suffice it to say that as the realm grew into a colonizing Empire, the colonies developed their own language of common prayer, continuous with but also distinct from the English BCP. And the Episcopal Church in the new United States of America is one of the prime examples.

 

The American BCP has undergone its own transformations, with major revisions appearing in 1892 and 1928, and our current Prayer Book in 1979. The 1979 BCP departed from previous editions by including both Rite I (traditional language) and Rite II (contemporary language) forms for the Daily Office and the Eucharist. Moreover, there are at least six distinct Eucharistic Prayers in the current BCP. (Well, in 2024 General Convention changed the definition of what counts as the “Book of Common Prayer” to include “Those liturgical forms and other texts authorized by the General Convention in accordance with this article and the Canons of this Church,” but that’s a story for another day.) Just as the common language of prayer expanded during the colonial expansion of the realm to the empire, so too, the 1979 BCP expanded the forms of prayer, especially of the Eucharist. Some of those who grew up with the 1928 BCP find the expansion unsettling, because a) it makes for a more difficult book to navigate, and b) the expansion might threaten the sense that we share a single language of prayer.

 

And yet, the 1979 BCP has help up pretty well. Sure, there are small tweaks here and there I would prefer, but on the whole, once one gets used to it, it is still able to bind us together in a common language of prayer. And. It’s always there for you when you need it.

When I handed our confirmands their BCPs I told them this story: When I was in college I was part of an evangelical campus ministry. We prayed extemporaneously (not with “wrote down” prayers), as the Spirit led us. And I was pretty good at it. Until I wasn’t. Toward the end of my senior year I struggled in my language of prayer. I didn’t feel like I had the words to pray what I wanted to pray. But when I made a quick visit home, I picked up my great aunt’s BCP. I brought it back with me to college. And I found words that said what I wanted to say, and words that I needed to hear. It opened up a new language of prayer for me. Or rather, it introduced me to a time-tested and venerable language that I knew little about. It gave me a language of prayer that I didn’t have to make up, but that was already a tradition of common prayer. It contained a set of forms of prayer and a language of prayer that bound me to living and historic community, that bound me to the greater church.

 

Now, I’ll admit, the BCPs in our pews are a little difficult to navigate, but the next time you’re in church, let me encourage you to crack it open, flip through its pages, and scan the lines. It's a book that has guided and shaped the prayers of Anglicans and Episcopalians for centuries. You might just find a language of prayer that is ours, a way of common prayer that you didn’t know could be yours.


By Andrew Guffey May 3, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
May 2, 2026
Haunted by Dorothy Day.
By Peter Trumbore April 28, 2026
OK, before you feel the urge to point it out, I know that this is probably the most misquoted line in cinema history. The words, "play it again, Sam," are never uttered in the the classic 1942 film Casablanca. Instead, Ilsa (played by Ingrid Bergman), says "Play it once, Sam, for old times' sake." Accurate, but not really fit for our purpose this week. What do I mean? Well, we're revisiting a topic that was on our agenda a couple of weeks ago but which, due to some unforeseen circumstances, we didn't actually get to. So we're literally going to play it again. Just after Easter, we were going to talk about one of the episodes that leads up to the climactic events of Holy Week, Jesus flipping the tables of the money changers and merchants and driving them from the Temple. Take a look at the PubTheo entry for April 7 for the full outline of the discussion topic. But suffice it to say, Jesus makes quite a scene, and in the process leaves us with some things we can contemplate. Join us for the conversation this evening, Tuesday April 28, and help us figure out what tables Jesus would flip and who he would drive from the Temple today. The discussion starts at 7pm at Irish Tavern in downtown Lake Orion. 
By Andrew Guffey April 26, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey April 23, 2026
What to hold onto when the truth varies.
By Peter Trumbore April 20, 2026
An article in The Washington Post from a week or so ago (I'll link to it in a minute) caught my eye as it brings us back to a topic area we've spent some time with before, the intersection of faith and technology. Specifically it's about Artificial Intelligence. But unlike the last time we discussed this, we're not playing around with Chatbot Jesus. It turns out that last month, the AI company Anthropic, creators of the Claude chatbot, convened a summit with Christian leaders, from both Roman Catholic and Protestant traditions, for advice on how to steer Claude's moral and spiritual development as it reacts to complex and unpredictable ethical queries from users. For example, advice on how to respond to users grieving the loss of a loved one, or whether the chatbot considered itself a "child of God." According to the article from The Post ( which you car read by clicking this link ): “They’re growing something that they don’t fully know what it’s going to turn out as,” said Brendan McGuire, a Catholic priest based in Silicon Valley who has written about faith and technology, and participated in the discussions at Anthropic. “We’ve got to build in ethical thinking into the machine so it’s able to adapt dynamically.” Attendees also discussed how Claude should engage with users at risk of self-harm, and the right attitude for the chatbot to adopt toward its own potential demise, such as being shut off, said one participant, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of the conversations. The summit comes as the rapid spread of AI across society puts Silicon Valley leaders under pressure to account for the impact of their technology. Concern about job losses to automation has grown as more businesses have embraced AI. OpenAI and Google have been sued by the families of people who died by suicide after intense and personal conversations with chatbots. Anthropic officials say that they plan to convene similar meetings with representatives of other religious and philosophical traditions. That this is just the start of their effort to give Claude a moral foundation. What do you make of this? Does this raise more questions in your mind than it answers? And how comfortable are you with the idea that chatbots need a moral foundation? What exactly are we creating with this technology? Do we even know? Join us for the conversation this Tuesday, April 21 at Irish Tavern in downtown Lake Orion. The discussion starts at 7pm.
By Andrew Guffey April 19, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey April 17, 2026
The problem of bloodthirsty delight
By Andrew Guffey April 12, 2026
This Sunday, all are welcome to join us for a morning of worship and fellowship. Whether you are with us in the sanctuary or joining from afar, your presence strengthens our community. Our service is at 9:30 a.m. We warmly welcome those who cannot attend in person to join us via our live stream.
By Andrew Guffey April 11, 2026
The Lord is Ris en Indeed.